Oral arguments have been heard in FCC v. Fox.
As you will recall the issue is" (w)hether the Federal Communications Commission's standards for indecency on television are too vague to be constitutional. "
The facts of the case involve Cher's "fleeting expletive" and Janet Jackson's Super Bowl "wardrobe malfunction."
For a summary you can read the AP report.
But if you want the full scoop you can catch up with all the facts and arguments at the SCOTUSBlog.
What do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment